Preliminary Investigation on Efficacy and Safety of Substance P-Coated Stent for Promoting Re-Endothelialization: A Porcine Coronary Artery Restenosis Model.

BACKGROUND: Current polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DESs) have fundamental issues about inflammation and delayed re-endothelializaton of the vessel wall. Substance-P (SP), which plays an important role in inflammation and endothelial cells, has not yet been applied to coronary stents. Therefore, this study compares poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)-based everolimus-eluting stents (PLGA-EESs) versus 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC)-based SP-eluting stents (MPC-SPs) in in-vitro and in-vivo models. METHODS: The morphology of the stent surface and peptide/drug release kinetics from stents were evaluated. The in-vitro proliferative effect of SP released from MPC-SP is evaluated using human umbilical vein endothelial cell. Finally, the safety and efficacy of the stent are evaluated after inserting it into a pig's coronary artery. RESULTS: Similar to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP had a uniform surface morphology with very thin coating layer thickness (2.074 µm). MPC-SP showed sustained drug release of SP for over 2 weeks. Endothelial cell proliferation was significantly increased in groups treated with SP (n = 3) compared with the control (n = 3) and those with everolimus (n = 3) (SP: 118.9 ± 7.61% vs. everolimus: 64.3 ± 12.37% vs. the control: 100 ± 6.64%, p < 0.05). In the animal study, the percent stenosis was higher in MPC-SP group (n = 7) compared to PLGA-EES group (n = 7) (MPC-SP: 28.6 ± 10.7% vs. PLGA-EES: 16.7 ± 6.3%, p < 0.05). MPC-SP group showed, however, lower inflammation (MPC-SP: 0.3 ± 0.26 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.2 ± 0.48, p < 0.05) and fibrin deposition (MPC-SP: 1.0 ± 0.73 vs. PLGA-EES: 1.5 ± 0.59, p < 0.05) around the stent strut. MPC-SP showed more increased expression of cluster of differentiation 31, suggesting enhanced re-endothelialization. CONCLUSION: Compared to PLGA-EES, MPC-SP demonstrated more decreased inflammation of the vascular wall and enhanced re-endothelialization and stent coverage. Hence, MPC-SP has the potential therapeutic benefits for the treatment of coronary artery disease by solving limitations of currently available DESs.

Performance evaluation of biodegradable polymer sirolimus and ascorbic acid eluting stent systems.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of biodegradable polymer sirolimus and ascorbic acid eluting stent systems with four commercially available drug-eluting stents (DES). We investigated the characterization of mechanical properties by dimension, foreshortening, recoil, radial force, crossing profile, folding shape, trackability, and dislodgement force. Additionally, we identify the safety and efficacy evaluation through registry experiments. Each foreshortening and recoil of D + Storm® DES is 1.3 and 3.70%, which has better performance than other products. A post-marketing clinical study to evaluate the performance and safety of D + Storm® DES is ongoing in real-world clinical settings. Two hundred one patients were enrolled in this study and have now completed follow-up for up to 1 month. No major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) occurred in any subjects, confirming the safety of D + Storm® DES in the clinical setting. An additional approximately 100 subjects will be enrolled in the study and the final safety profile will be assessed in 300 patients. In conclusion, this study reported the objective evaluation of DES performance and compared the mechanical responses of four types of DES available in the market. There is little difference between the four cardiovascular stents in terms of mechanical features, and it can help choose the most suitable stent in a specific clinical situation if those features are understood. Graphical abstract.